Legal Opinion

Braine v. City of Stroud

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 17, 1963No. 39816PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, Justice.

Plaintiffs in error have appealed from the judgment of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to their petition for damages. The action on appeal was instituted May 9, 1961. Plaintiff had-on October 7, 1960, in a sepa•rate case, obtained judgment in a mandamus proceeding against the defendants and ■a copy of that judgment was attached to the petition in this cause. The petition showed that in the mandamus proceeding 'the trial court had directed the reconnection of electric, water and sewer services at plaintiffs’ residence, enjoined the city ■ from attempting to' collect the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LarabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Smith v. BerrymanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  3. Achey v. CreechWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Bath v. DumasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. City of Shawnee v. City of TecumsehSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Chandler (U.S.A.), Inc. v. TyreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Massey v. City of Oklahoma CityDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Heaney v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF GARDEN VAL., ETC.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Board of County Commisioners v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API