Legal Opinion
Bath v. Dumas
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 21, 1925No. 15952PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This was a proceeding for a writ of mandamus to compel the director of the district school board to deliver Ithe sehoolhouse keys and possession of the sehoolhouse to plaintiff, in order that she could fulfill her contract with the board to teach’ a nine months’ term of school. The cause is here by appeal from the judgment of the district court refusing to issue the writ.
The facts are that in April, 1924, plaintiff, Bessie Bath, entered into a contract with the then existing school board of district No. 76, Creek county, to teach a nine months’ term of school at $125 per month. She held no…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Equalization of Oklahoma Co. v. First State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Kibby v. BinionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Leahy v. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Champlin v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Huddleston v. Board of Comrs. of Noble Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick and Gamon Meter Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Morrison v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Textile Workers Union v. Paris Fabric Mills, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Beaver v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.