Board of County Commisioners v. City of Muskogee
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Chief Justice.
Three questions are tendered in appeal No. 72,761: [1] Does the statute-mandated program of revaluation of taxable county property1 impose a duty on a recipient municipality of ad valorem tax revenues to pay its share of the revaluation cost? Should this question be answered in the affirmative, then [2] Does the county excise board also have a statute-imposed obligation to make ad valorem millage for payment of these costs available to a municipality? and [3] Do the provisions of 68 O.S.1981 § 2481.4,2 when applied to a municipality, contravene our constitutional or…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Maule v. Independent School District No. 9Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Democratic Party of Oklahoma v. EstepSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Underside v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State ex rel. Macy v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Simpson v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Trant v. OklahomaDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
- Joshua C. ex rel. Denise L. v. Western Heights Independent School District No. I-41Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.