Legal Opinion

Board of County Commisioners v. City of Muskogee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 5, 1991No. 72761, 72748PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Chief Justice.

Three questions are tendered in appeal No. 72,761: [1] Does the statute-mandated program of revaluation of taxable county property1 impose a duty on a recipient municipality of ad valorem tax revenues to pay its share of the revaluation cost? Should this question be answered in the affirmative, then [2] Does the county excise board also have a statute-imposed obligation to make ad valorem millage for payment of these costs available to a municipality? and [3] Do the provisions of 68 O.S.1981 § 2481.4,2 when applied to a municipality, contravene our constitutional or…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Maule v. Independent School District No. 9Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Democratic Party of Oklahoma v. EstepSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Underside v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Macy v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Simpson v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Trant v. OklahomaDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
  5. Joshua C. ex rel. Denise L. v. Western Heights Independent School District No. I-41Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API