Legal Opinion
Chandler (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Tyree
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 9, 2004No. 96,436PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.
¶ 1 The substantive issue in this proceeding involves whether the Commissioner of the State Insurance Fund 1 was required to provide workers' compensation insurance to *600a company who competes with the Fund in providing workers' compensation insurance. Plaintiffs, three insurance entities with common ownership, Chandler (U.S.A.), National American Insurance Company, and Lagere & Walkingstick Insurance Agency, Inc., (collectively, Chandler), are in the business of providing workers' compensation insurance. However, only National American Insurance Company is an insurance carrier.
¶ 2 Chandler…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Retherford v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Scott v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.