Legal Opinion

Todd v. Kaw Valley Drainage District

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 12, 1921No. 23,235PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 2; Frank D. Hutchings, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

William M. Todd sued the Kaw Valley Drainage District alleging that while working as a deck hand on a dredge-boat used by it in cleaning out the channel of the Kansas river he was injured as the result of the negligent conduct of the foreman. A demurrer to his evidence was sustained, and he appeals.

The sole question presented is whether a drainage district organized under the Kansas statute by the board of county commissioners, upon the petition of two-fifths of the resident taxpayers, is liable for the negligent acts of its agents while…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bowden v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Rose v. City of GypsumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Hibbard v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Bunting v. Oak Creek Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Whiteman v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Arundel Corp. v. GriffinSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  3. Rabin v. Lake Worth Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. State ex rel. Mellott v. MasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Gorman v. City of RosedaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API