Legal Opinion

Rose v. City of Gypsum

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1919No. 21,990PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Saline district court; Dallas Grover, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The plaintiffs sued Gypsum .City and a large number of persons for damages on account of fatal injuries sustained by their minor son, who was struck by an automobile driven by one of the defendants in an auto race which was *413held on a public road and street in and adjacent to Gypsum City.

Early in 1916, the local lodge of Modern Woodmen determined to hold a four days’ carnival in Gypsum City in the month of August. A committee of the lodge obtained from the city government the right to use • two blocks of Maple street for the carnival. The…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harper v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Gould v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  3. Hibbard v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. City of Osage City v. LarkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. La Clef v. City of ConcordiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Wendler v. City of Great BendSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Boykin v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Warren v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Krantz v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API