Legal Opinion

Gorman v. City of Rosedale

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1925No. 25,476PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action by a father for the death of his sixteen-year-old son, who was drowned at the entrance of an artificial tunnel which the city of Rosedale had bored through a hill for an outlet to the Kansas river to divert the water of a creek which theretofore had meandered back and forth through parts of Rosedale, Kan., and Kansas City, Mo., and which in wet weather was wont to subject parts of those cities to inundation and damage to life and *21property. In dry weather the creek was sluggish, serving as an open sewer for the two cities,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Harper v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Price v. Atchison Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Kansas Central Railway Co. v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  4. Biggs v. Consolidated Barb-Wire Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. Consolidated Electric-light & Power Co. v. HealySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Warren v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Bruce ex rel. Bruce v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Gilliland v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Perry v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Villani v. Wilmington Housing AuthoritySuperior Court of Delaware · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API