Legal Opinion

Arundel Corp. v. Griffin

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 20, 1925PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

The amended declaration herein, filed by W. D. Griffin and T. M. Griffin, purports to state a cause of action against The Arundel Corporation, a corporation, and the Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District. The first count sets up the particulars of an alleged concerted action and a joint tort by the defendants by causing the plaintiffs’ lands to be overflowed with water (following unusually heavy rainfalls), in negligently prosecuting drainage operations in the Everglades of the State, while the second count contains similar allegations in stating a taking- of the plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Keggin v. County of HillsboroughSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
  3. Bradbury v. Vandalia Levee & Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Selden v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  5. Wood v. Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Spangler v. Florida State Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Board of Public Instruction v. Town of Bay Harbor I.Supreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Village of Tequesta v. Jupiter Inlet Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
  4. Florida Power Corp. v. City of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  5. Duval Engineering and Contracting Co. v. SalesSupreme Court of Florida · 1954

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API