Legal Opinion
Castro v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 18, 2009No. A133355PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Petitioner is serving a life sentence for felony murder. His first parole eligibility date was February 2006. After an “exit interview” in August 2005, the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) postponed his parole release date for two years. Petitioner sought administrative review, which was denied. He now seeks judicial review, arguing (among other things) that the board’s order is not supported by substantial evidence. ORS 144.335(3); ORS 183.482(8). We agree. We therefore reverse and remand.
In 1977, at the age of 25, petitioner murdered his stepfather, apparently at the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Martin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Salosha, Inc. v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Rinne v. Psychiatric Sec. Review Bd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Mendacino v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Dixon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Knotts v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Alcala v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.