Legal Opinion

Donahue v. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 18, 1919PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, First Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of tiie Court by

Judge Sampson

Affirming.

The Louisville, Henderson & St. L. Ry. Co., operates an interstate railroad, and was at the times complained of and is now -engaged in interstate commerce. Appellant Jerry Donahue .was employed by said railway company as one of a crew of trackmen engaged in maintaining the tracks in the Louisville yards of said company. On September 21, 1916, appellant Donahue and a colored man named Logsclen were directed by the foreman of the gang to take a spike maul and a chisel T .rail cutter and go to a certain pile of T rails in the yards of the company…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DeAtleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Stirling Coal & Coke Co. v. ForkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Ohio Valley Railway Co. v. CopleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. GaddSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Luton Mining Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. DeMoss v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Blackaby v. L. N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API