Legal Opinion

Blackaby v. L. N. R. Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 2, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirming.

Appellant, Clarence Blackaby, was employed as a section hand by appellee, Louisville Nashville Railroad Company, and while engaged in that labor for it claims to have been injured because of its negligence. He instituted this action to recover for the injury, and upon the trial, at the conclusion of the evidence introduced for him, the trial court sustained appellee's motion for a directed verdict in its favor. From the judgment entered dismissing his petition he prosecutes this appeal.

It appears that in September, 1923, while a section crew was engaged in track repairing appellant,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Book v. City of HendersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Ohio Valley Railway Co. v. CopleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Pruitt v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  4. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  5. Donahue v. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Darbe v. Crystal Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Davidson v. Perkins-Bowling Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Kempe v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API