Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Holbrook
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge McCandless
Reversing.
Appellee, a boy 19 years of age, was at work as a ■ section hand for appellant. Several crews were engaged in clearing a wreck which had occurred some sixteen hours before. The tracks were cleared but the rails had not been closed and for this purpose two T-rails had to be cut. Two pairs of workmen, each composed of a section foreman and his helper, were engaged in this and hastening its accomplishment.
To do this a T-rail cutter is placed edge down upon the rail and ■struck with a heavy sledge. The cutter is a wedge-like tool about six inches…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Louisville & N. R. R. v. LogsdonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Louisville & N. R. R. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Interstate Coal Co. v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Ware v. SaufleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railroad v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fullenwider v. BrawnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Jackson v. CookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- State Highway Commission v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.