Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Holbrook

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 21, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge McCandless

Reversing.

Appellee, a boy 19 years of age, was at work as a ■ section hand for appellant. Several crews were engaged in clearing a wreck which had occurred some sixteen hours before. The tracks were cleared but the rails had not been closed and for this purpose two T-rails had to be cut. Two pairs of workmen, each composed of a section foreman and his helper, were engaged in this and hastening its accomplishment.

To do this a T-rail cutter is placed edge down upon the rail and ■struck with a heavy sledge. The cutter is a wedge-like tool about six inches…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Louisville & N. R. R. v. LogsdonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  2. Louisville & N. R. R. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  3. Interstate Coal Co. v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Ware v. SaufleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railroad v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fullenwider v. BrawnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Jackson v. CookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. State Highway Commission v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API