Stirling Coal & Coke Co. v. Fork
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Hopkins Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Carroll
Reversing.
The appellee, Fork, a man of mature years and ordinary intelligence was employed by appellant company to sliovel coal slack into a car and was told to gel- a shovel that had been nsed by others who-had done the same kind of work. When appellee picked up the shovel, he discovered that the-round wooden piece on the top of the handle was cracked in one or two places, so that the wood revolved on the iron rod that was run through it for the purpose of strengthening the handle. He then said to the foreman that he did not want to nse that shovel, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- American Tobacco Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Pullman Co. v. GellerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fordyce Lumber Co. v. LynnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Cole v. Spokane Gas & Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Ohio Valley Railway Co. v. CopleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Bevin v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. GuinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.