Legal Opinion

Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Henry

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 18, 1914PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Reversing.

In this action for damages for personal injuries against defendant, Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway, plaintiff, Toy Henry, recovered a verdict and judgment of $12,000. Defendant appeals.

It is admitted that at the time of the accident defendant was engaged and plaintiff was employed in interstate commerce. The action is prosecuted under the Act of April 22, 1908 (35 Stat. L., 66, Chap. 149), as amended April 5, 1910 (36 Stat. L., 291, Chap. 143; U. S. Comp. Stat. Supp., 1911, p. 1324), relating to the liability of *90rail…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. EarnestSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Laughlin v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  2. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Swann's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Forgy v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API