Legal Opinion

DeMoss v. Great Northern Railway Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1937No. File No. 6464PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

The plaintiff, an employee of the defendant, was injured while working under the direction of a foreman in removing false decking from a freight car. Plaintiff says he never performed such work before; that he was not familiar with the number of men required; that in removing the decking and taking it down some of it fell upon him and he was injured; and that this injury was caused “by reason of the negligence and carelessness of the said defendant in failing to furnish a sufficient number of men to do the work in which plaintiff was engaged, and by reason of the negligence and carelessness…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ProffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. PadgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Kanawha & Michigan Railway Co. v. KerseSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Pryor v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Froh v. HeinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Maloney v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Olson v. Kem Temple, Ancient Arabic OrderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Olson v. Kem Temple, Ancient Arabic OrderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Willert v. NielsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API