Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Perminter

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1947No. Civ. 3542PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action to enforce specific performance of an oral contract for the sale, for $8,000, of a stock of groceries, store fixtures and furnishings, and the assignment of defendant Perminter’s interest in a lease on the store premises which had more than one year to run. Plaintiffs paid defendants $50 on account of the purchase price at the time of making the oral agreement.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint, an amended complaint and a second amended complaint.

The second amended complaint attempted to state three causes of action. The first…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Buckmaster v. BertramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Manha v. Union Fertilizer Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Reay v. ReayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Eastern Rolling Mill Co. v. MichlovitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  5. Reymond v. LaboudigueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Glogau v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Moss Estate Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Dunzweiler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Stanley v. KawakamiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API