Dunzweiler v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.
The question presented on this appeal is whether the respondent superior court abused its discretion by denying petitioner leave to file a cross-complaint in an action for damages for personal injuries and property damage. We have concluded that the court did abuse its discretion under the circumstances hereinafter set forth, and that a peremptory writ of mandate should issue to compel the filing of the proposed pleading.
On April 14, 1967 an action was filed against petitioner and his wife seeking damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. The complaint alleged that…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Case v. Kadota Fig Ass'n of ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Rabe v. Western Union Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Case v. Kadota Fig Assn.California Supreme Court · 1950
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rainer v. Community Memorial HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- IMO Development Corp. v. Dow Corning Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Hulsey v. KoehlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Betancourt v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Green v. Rancho Santa Margarita Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.