Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Kawakami

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 1954No. Civ. 15915PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of respondent Paschote. The action arises out of a collision involving several automobiles which is alleged to have occurred on January 7, 1951. The complaint was filed on March 12, 1951, and respondent was served as Doe One, a fictitious defendant, on April 7, 1951. Respondent filed an answer which consisted of denials and separate affirmative defenses of plaintiff’s negligence proximately contributing to his damage, assumption of risk and unavoidable accident.

The case was set for trial on April 17, 1953, and at the outset…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vogel v. Thrifty Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Moss Estate Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Gates v. Wendling Nathan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Kolodziejski v. HoverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Sullivan v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Barnes v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. City of Stanton v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Lipman v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Armstrong v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API