Legal Opinion

Reay v. Reay

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1929No. Docket No. 6533PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

In this action after a trial by jury the court below determined that the action was one in equity and, disregarding entirely the verdict of the jury, entered judgment for defendants, from which judgment the appeal is taken. At the outset, therefore, we are called upon to review the pleadings in some detail to the end that the nature of the controversy may be made clear and also the relief asked.

The subject matter of the action is certain personal property alleged to have belonged to Christiana G. Beay at the time of her death. It will be unnecessary to give any detailed…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. In Re the Guardianship of CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Estate of SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Koppikus v. State Capitol Comm'rsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. California Press Manufacturing Co. v. Stafford Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1923

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. McAllisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Vilardo v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Hise v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Woolsey v. WoolseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. State Ex Rel. Witte Hardware Co. v. McElhinneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API