Glogau v. Hagan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
This appeal is on the judgment roll. Having no evidence for review on the merits, all presumptions and intendments favor the correctness of the judgment. (R ounds v. Dippolito, 94 Cal.App.2d 412, 417 [210 P.2d 893].) By including in the record numerous docu ments not pertinent to the narrow issues thus presented, the scope of the appeal is not thereby widened. (Hunt v. Plavsa, 103 Cal.App.2d 222, 224 [229 P.2d 482].)
Plaintiff as assignee of Abraham Gottfried sued for $15,000 on account of legal services alleged to have been rendered to appellants. Judgment was ultimately entered for the sum…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Parker v. James Granger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Parker v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- McCarthy v. Mt. Tecarte Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Harmon v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Byram v. Superior Ct. of Sacramento Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- White v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Beasley v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.