Legal Opinion
Ahtna Tene Nené v. State, Department of Fish & Game
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 2012No. Nos. S-13968, S-14297PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*455OPINION
CARPENETI, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before 2009 the Alaska Board of Game employed a controversial scoring system in order to distribute permits to subsistence hunters in a popular caribou and moose hunting area between Anchorage and Fairbanks. In 2009, the Board amended its regulations to abolish the scoring system and replace it with two separate subsistence hunts: a community harvest hunt for groups and a separate hunt for individuals. A local tribe was subsequently granted a community harvest permit pursuant to the new rules. An individual resident brought suit challenging the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc. v. SheehanAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Jefferson v. AsplundAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Fairbanks Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1324 v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Manning v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Alaska Community Action on Toxics v. HartigAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Leahy v. ConantAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Alaska Fish & Wildlife Conservation Fund v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2015
- Manning v. State, Dept. of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.