Fairbanks Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1324 v. City of Fairbanks
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This appeal poses the question whether the Alaska Labor Relations Agency has jurisdiction to decide if an issue is arbitrable. The agency ruled that it had that power, and held that the underlying issue in this case was arbitrable. The superior court concluded that the agency did not have that power, but agreed that the underlying issue was arbitra-ble, and so it affirmed the agency decision. We first hold that, while the arbitrability issue is technically moot under the procedural posture of this case, 1 the public interest exeeption to the mootness…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Wetherhorn v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Jacob v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Akpik v. State, Office of Management & BudgetAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.