Legal Opinion

Leahy v. Conant

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2019No. 7342 S-16781PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAASSEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A prisoner sued two prison superintendents, claiming that a mail policy instituted by the Alaska Department of Corrections (DOC) violated his religious rights because it prohibited him from writing letters to fellow Muslims in two other prisons. He asked for damages and a declaratory judgment that the mail policy violated the Alaska Constitution and the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA).

DOC rescinded the policy while the case was pending. The superior court granted summary judgment in favor of the superintendents, finding…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Keilan Ebli v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Brent McCormick v. Chippewa, Inc. and Louis OlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Harry N. Young, Jr. v. State of Alaska Office of Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor Kevin Meyer, in an official capacity Division of Elections, and Director Gail Fenumiai, in an official capacityAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Patrick H. Torrence v. Tyler BlueAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Robert A. v. Tatiana D.Alaska Supreme Court · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API