Alaska Fish & Wildlife Conservation Fund v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAASSEN, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Regulations promulgated by the Alaska Board of Game establish two different systems of subsistence hunting for moose and caribou in Alaska's Copper Basin region: (1) community hunts for groups following a hunting pattern similar to the one traditionally practiced by members of the Ahtna Tene Nene' community; and (2) individual hunts.1 A private outdoors group, the Alaska Fish and Wildlife Conservation Fund, argues that this regulatory framework violates the equal access and equal protection clauses of the Alaska Constitution by establishing a preference…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Treacy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Gilbert v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Manning v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Horne v. TouhakisAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Manning v. State, Dept. of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- In the Matter of the Hospitalization of April S.Alaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Edna L. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services, John L. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.