Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1983No. CA A23761, SC 28829PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*704PETERSON, J.

ORCP 70 A. requires every judgment to “be in writing plainly labeled as a judgment and set forth in a separate document.” The document from which this appeal is taken was entitled “FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND JUDGMENT.” It contained findings of fact and conclusions of law and concluded:

“JUDGMENT ORDER
“1. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiffs on all Counts of all of plaintiffs’ Claims for Relief.
“2. Defendant shall recover its costs and disbursements incurred herein taxed at $__
“DATED at Portland, Oregon this 12th day of January, 1982.

/…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. State v. Security Savings Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Ragnone v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Cenci v. Ellison Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Zidell v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Goeddertz v. ParchenOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In re the Marriage of CarrollCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Street v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API