Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Zidell v. Jones

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1986No. SC S31538PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*81CAMPBELL, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus. The relator was the plaintiff in a civil action in Multnomah County Circuit Court entitled Zidell v. Zidell, et al. The defendant in this proceeding was the trial judge in that action. This court granted an alternative writ of mandamus which required the defendant to show cause why he had not signed and directed entry of a final judgment as to all parties in the Multnomah County case. The defendant’s answer in effect alleged that a final judgment had previously been entered, and that in any event the relator is not entitled to relief by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  4. Jetco Electronic Industries, Inc. v. GardinerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. Carolyn HUCKEBY, Plaintiff, v. FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS, Defendant-Appellee, v. Alice BOBO, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Propp v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. Gattman v. AbrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springville Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Department of Revenue v. Universal Foods Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Ketcham v. SellesOregon Supreme Court · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API