State v. McDonnell
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is a death penalty review case. Our review of the record reveals no document entitled “judgment of conviction.” The statute conferring on this court direct jurisdiction over cases of this kind speaks of a “judgment of conviction.” For the reasons that follow, we conclude that such a document is required in order for the trial court to have completed its duties. We further conclude that the proper remedy is to give the trial court leave to enter a judgment of conviction.
ORS miSOUKf) 1 provides for automatic review by this court of “the judgment of conviction and sentence of death” in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- May v. Josephine Memorial Hospital, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Zidell v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Helms Groover & Dubber Co. v. CopenhagenOregon Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CarrilloOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. ColgroveOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. BonnerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.