Legal Opinion

Goeddertz v. Parchen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1985No. TC 136-707 CA A31783 SC S31558PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*279MEMORANDUM OPINION

Petitioner, the personal representative in the probate estate from which this present controversy arose, sought reversal by the Court of Appeals of two circuit court determinations entered in the probate estate. The relief sought before the Court of Appeals was, in principal part, reversal of a “Judgment-Order”1 entered in circuit court in respect of a hearing upon an objection to the final account in the probate estate. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion.

We do not reach the merits of this case. The two documents upon which petitioner bases her appeal are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. Carriage InnOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Cockrum v. GrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Meyer v. JosephOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Gibson v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Baugh v. Bryant Limited PartnershipsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Department of Revenue v. Universal Foods Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Baugh v. Bryant Limited PartnershipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Galfano v. KTVL-TVCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Springer v. GollyhornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API