Legal Opinion

Ragnone v. Portland School District No. 1J

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1980No. TC A7809 14371, CA 14807, SC 26870PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*341LENT, J.

The issue is whether there is appellate jurisdiction. Plaintiff had judgment upon a jury verdict. The trial court allowed defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed. Ragnone v. Portland Sch. Dist. No. 1J, 44 Or App 347, 605 P2d 1217 (1980). We allowed plaintiff’s petition for review, ORS 2.520; 289 Or 71 (1980).

During oral argument in this court on June 3, 1980, we questioned whether there was appellate jurisdiction, ORS 2.516 and 19.010. Pursuant to this court’s request a memorandum has been filed since…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Abrahamson v. Northwestern Pulp & Paper Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. J. Gregcin, Inc. v. City of DaytonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Barr v. Linnton Plywood Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Longee v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. McCarger v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. CurranOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Waybrant v. BernsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. SnyderOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Meyer v. JosephOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Cenci v. Ellison Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API