Legal Opinion

Cenci v. Ellison Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1980No. CA 16255, SC 26824PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

The defendant The Ellison Company’s appeal to the Court of Appeals was dismissed on motion of its co-defendant Schermerhorn. We granted review.

The parties to this appeal, The Ellison Company (hereinafter "Ellison”) and Schermerhorn, were co-defendants in an action which resulted in a directed verdict for defendants. A remaining issue, however, was Ellison’s cross-claim against Schermerhorn for attorney fees incurred in defending the action. Schermerhom’s motion for summary judgment on the cross-claim was allowed. Ellison’s appeal to the Court of Appeals was dismissed for the reason that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ragnone v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Stahl v. KrasowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Cockrum v. GrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hall Et Ux. v. PettiboneOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Linn-Benton Distributing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. May v. Josephine Memorial Hospital, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Murray Well-Drilling v. DeischCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Gibson v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Street v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Baugh v. Bryant Limited PartnershipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API