State ex rel. Zonders v. Delaware County Board of Elections
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Relators contend that the board of elections erred in its determination that the township trustees’ approval of the application to rezone the property was not referendable pursuant to R.C. 519.021 because (1) the proposed development is not a planned-unit development (“PUD”), since it does not integrate a mixture of uses as required by R.C. 519.021, (2) R.C. 519.021 does not preclude a referendum with respect to rezoning of the land, (3) Section 1, Article II of the Ohio Constitution guarantees a right of referendum in this case, and (4) a person who files an application to rezone land from…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Cline v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Independent Insurance v. FabeOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Lutz v. City of LongviewWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- State ex rel. Ruehlmann v. LukenOhio Supreme Court · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State ex rel. Purdy v. Clermont County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Wolfe v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Purdy v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Crossman Communities of Ohio, Inc. v. Greene County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Hazel v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.