State ex rel. Hazel v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Relators initially request a writ of mandamus. The board’s decision to uphold the protest will be set aside and a writ of mandamus will issue to compel placement of the proposed ordinance on the November 4 ballot if the board engaged in fraud, corruption, abuse of discretion or clear disregard of statutes or applicable legal provisions.1 State ex rel. Hawkins v. Pickaway Cty. Bd. of Elections (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 275, 277, 662 N.E.2d 17, 19. Relators assert that the board abused its discretion and acted in clear disregard of applicable law by refusing to certify the proposed ordinance for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Donnelly v. City of Fairview ParkOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State ex rel. Thurn v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Christy v. Summit County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Markus v. Trumbull County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State ex rel. Wolfe v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Becker v. City of EastlakeOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. North Main Street Coalition v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State ex rel. Becker v. EastlakeOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Citizen Action for a Livable Montgomery v. Hamilton County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.