Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Purdy v. Clermont County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1996No. 96-2067PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The issue in this case is whether respondents properly concluded that R.C. 3513.04 barred relators from running for the offices of the State Board in the November 1996 general election. R.C. 3513.04 provides that “[n]o person who seeks party nomination for an office or position at a primary election by declaration of candidacy * * * shall be permitted to become a candidate at the following general election for any office by nominating petition or by write-in.” (Emphasis added.) R.C. 3513.259 specifies that “[njominations of candidates for the office of member of the state board of education…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Colbert v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Wadd v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. BSW Development Group v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Wolfe v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2000

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API