Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ruehlmann v. Luken

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1992No. 92-1343PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam

For the following reasons, we reject relators’ claims and deny the writ of mandamus.

R.C. 3501.11 provides in part:

“In all cases of a tie vote or a disagreement in the board [of elections], if no decision can be arrived at, the director or chairman shall submit the matter in controversy to the secretary of state, who shall summarily decide the question and his decision shall be final.”

We have held that the Secretary of State’s decisions, otherwise final, may be reviewed for “fraud, corruption, abuse of discretion or a clear disregard of statutes or court determinations.” State ex rel. Ferguson…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stern v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State ex rel. Senn v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hitt v. TresslerOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Flex v. GwinOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State ex rel. Saffold v. TimminsOhio Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Herman v. KlopfleischOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Phillips v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Squire v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Zonders v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Ascani v. Stark Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API