Independent Insurance v. Fabe
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtQuillin, J.
The principal issue in this case is whether R.C. 3905.01(B) and 3905.04 prohibit the licensing of applicants affiliated with non-insurance financial institutions. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the statutes permit such licensing.
I
Background
At the outset it should be recognized that the insurance industry is a mature, highly regulated industry with sophisticated legal and legislative *313advisors. This case is part of a “turf battle” for insurance business. As observed by another court, there is “a huge commercial tug-of-war between the bank holding company industry on one hand and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carter v. Division of WaterOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Johnson & Higgins Co. v. SaffordOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Fort Hamilton-Hughes Memorial Hospital Center v. SouthardOhio Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by63 opinions
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. DrosteOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Richard v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1994
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.