Legal Opinion

Independent Insurance v. Fabe

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1992No. 90-2106PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillin, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether R.C. 3905.01(B) and 3905.04 prohibit the licensing of applicants affiliated with non-insurance financial institutions. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the statutes permit such licensing.

I

Background

At the outset it should be recognized that the insurance industry is a mature, highly regulated industry with sophisticated legal and legislative *313advisors. This case is part of a “turf battle” for insurance business. As observed by another court, there is “a huge commercial tug-of-war between the bank holding company industry on one hand and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carter v. Division of WaterOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State Ex Rel. Johnson & Higgins Co. v. SaffordOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Fort Hamilton-Hughes Memorial Hospital Center v. SouthardOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. DrosteOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Richard v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1994

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API