Kerr v. Staufer
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MISER, C.
This is the second appeal of this case. At both trials in circuit court appellants Staufer had verdict in their favor. Judgment on the first verdict was reversed -by this court. 52 S. D. 223, 217 N. W. 211, 213. The decision in that case concluded: “If the jury was satisfied by the evidence that defendants had been damaged, their next duty was to determine the amount of the damage which, pro tanto, would be a defense. This necessitated an instruction as to the true measure of damages, which they did not receive. In view -of the fact that a new trial must be had, the answer should be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nadeau v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Ward v. Dakota Telephone & Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Lunscheon v. WocknitzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Hallen v. MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- Barker v. CoatsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- O'CONNOR v. KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Weeks v. Prostrollo Sons, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Holmes v. CouturierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Tucek v. MuellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Main v. Professional and Business Men's Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.