Legal Opinion

Hallen v. Martin

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1918No. File No. 3587PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brookings County. Hon. Carl G. Sherwood, Judge. Action by Peter Hallen, against W. B.' Martin; Jr., to. recover damages for fraud and deceit ini exchange of realty. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from 'am order denying a new trial, def-end!ant appeals; plaintiff mloiving toi dismiss the appeal.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brookings County. Hon. Carl G. Sherwood, Judge. Action by Peter Hallen, against W. B.' Martin; Jr., to. recover damages for fraud and deceit ini exchange of realty. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from 'am order denying a new trial, def-end!ant appeals; plaintiff mloiving toi dismiss the appeal. (i) To point once -of the opinion, Respondent cited: 20 Cyc. 136, 132-4; Merberry v. Watson, (Miasis.) 39 Am1. Dec. 726; McQaibe v. Desuoyers, (S. D.) 108 N. W. 341; PargO' Gas & 'Cake Oo. v. Pargq Gas & Elec. Oo. (N. D.) 59 N. W. 1066; Lu-nsohen v. Wockniitz, (S. D'.) m…

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, J.

Ini December, 1909, the plaintiff, pursuant to an agreement in writing theretofolre made, conveyed -to' defendant, subject to incumbrances, 360 acres of New Mexico land, and a lot in thie oi:ty of Brookings, S. D., and gave defendant a -bill of sale of a blacksmith shop on said lot. As¡ a consideration therefor plaintiff received- a deed -of 640 acres -Of New Mexico land, -and gave to defendant a mortgage of $2,880 thereon. Plaintiff took up hi.s residence upon his liewfy 'acquired- l'andl in January, 1910, and 'in Jume, 191-1,’ disposed of thie sarnie-. In 1912 he brought thi-s action for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Vail v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Krumm v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Morse v. HutchinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Wildcat Cave, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Goodnow v. Adelman (In Re Adelman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1988
  3. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Kerr v. StauferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Barker v. CoatsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API