Legal Opinion
Nadeau v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 25, 1927No. 25,781PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■Stone, J.
Action to recover on a policy of personal accident insurance, it being conceded that plaintiff is wholly and possibly permanently disabled. The defense is a compromise resulting in a formal release for consideration. After a verdict for plaintiff, defendant’s alternative motion resulted in an order for judgment. Plaintiff appeals.
The injury which caused plaintiff’s disability occurred May 14, 1923. Both he and his then employer were subject to the compensation law. He received compensation and treatment accordingly from the compensation insurer. For a period, he also received the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cruikshank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Peterson v. First National Bank of CeylonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Haviland v. . WilletsNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Richardson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Whitely v. Mississippi Water Power & Boom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Schoenfeld v. BukerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Mix v. DowningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- McClelland v. Carmichael Tile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Gethsemane Lutheran Church v. ZachoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.