Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Tucek v. Mueller

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1994No. 18122PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice (on reassignment).

PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUES

This is a civil lawsuit. Michelle Mueller Tucek (Tucek) charged her father, Garlan Mueller, with conversion, fraud and deceit concerning an insurance settlement. Maynard Hieb, First State Bank, Wayne Kino-nen, Crawford & Company, and Economy Fire & Casualty Company (collectively referred to as appellees) were also named as defendants for their alleged roles in the fraud and deceit.

Default judgment was entered against Mueller on November 26, 1990 due to his failure to answer the Complaint. The remaining defendants thereafter filed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. E & E HAULING, INC.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Waddell v. Dewey County BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Lalley v. Safway Steel Scaffolds, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Maybee v. Jacobs Motor Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Moe v. John Deere Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. US Lumber, Inc. v. FisherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Smith v. HermsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API