Legal Opinion
O'CONNOR v. King
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1991No. 17381, 17395PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
Michael and Barbara O’Connor (O’Connors) appeal trial court’s judgment granting rescission of a contract for deed to Vernell and Dianne King (Kings). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
O’Connors purchased the townhouse subject to this lawsuit in 1984. The townhouse is located in Sioux Falls. After living in the townhouse for approximately two years, O’Connors leased it to Kings on October 1, 1986, for $800 monthly rental. The lease contained an option to purchase the townhouse for $89,500. In the event Kings exercised their option to purchase, the option provided for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In the Interest of A.D.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Lowe v. Steele Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Tri-State Refining & Investment Co. v. Apaloosa Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Brown v. FowlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Smith v. SponheimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- City of Sioux Falls v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Matter of Estate of O'KeefeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Schuldies v. MillarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Knudsen v. JensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Credit Collection Services, Inc. v. PesickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.