Weeks v. Prostrollo Sons, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOMEYER, Judge.
These actions were consolidated for trial and resulted in a verdict for the defendant, Prostrollo Sons. Inc.,1 in each case upon which separate judgments were entered. Plaintiffs'2 motions for new trial were denied and they appeal.
Error is asserted in (1) instructions to the jury and (2) in refusing a new trial because of claimed invalid and inconsistent jury verdicts. In addition to denying reversible error on these points, defendant urges that if there was error, it was without prejudice because plaintiffs as a matter of law failed to establish submissible claims for jury…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Harrison Richardson v. Thomas E. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Kelly v. Huber Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- McCleod v. Tri-State Milling Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Myers v. QuenzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- White v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Daugaard v. Baltic Cooperative Building Supply Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Walz v. City of HudsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Lovell v. Oahe Electric CooperativeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Stevens v. Wood Sawmill, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Duncan v. Pennington County Housing AuthoritySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.