Legal Opinion

Kennewick Irrigation District v. Benton County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1934No. 25143. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

By foreclosure (pursuant to the provisions of Rem. Rev. Stat., §§7444 and 7445), of delinquent irrigation assessments against certain tracts of land lying within the Kennewick Irrigation District, the district acquired those parcels of land as a purchaser. One of the tracts was sold by the district to a stranger to the title. Some of the tracts were purchased from the district by their former owners. The remaining’ tracts acquired by it at tbe foreclosure sale are still owned by the district.

An action, in which three of the district’s vendees intervened, was instituted by the Kennewick…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Asplund v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Gasaway v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Board of County Com'rs of Woods County v. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. North Spokane Irrigation District No. 8 v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Libby, McNeill & Libby v. IvarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Gengler v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Lindsay Irrigation District v. Clallam CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Kiona Irrigation District v. Benton CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Becker v. Tig Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API