Legal Opinion

Asplund v. Alarid

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1923No. 2852PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF. THE COURT

BOTTS, J.

The plaintiff sues, as a taxpayer, on behalf of himself and others similarly'situated, to enjoin the .assessor and treasurer of Santa Fe county from giving effect to chapter 130 of the Session Laws of 1923, commonly known as the soldier exemption law, on the ground of the unconstitutionality of said act. The defendants demurred to the sufficiency.of the complaint, and the demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff-elected to stand on his complaint, whereupon judgment was entered dismissing the suit, ánd this appeal' taken.

Standing alone, the act requires no…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hammond v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. People Ex Rel. Killeen v. . AngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. City of Chicago v. ReevesIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Schmidt v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Mitchell v. Knox County Fiscal CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Capitol Addition Bldg. Commission v. ConnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Flaska v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State Ex Rel. Hannah v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. McFallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API