Legal Opinion

North Spokane Irrigation District No. 8 v. Spokane County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1933No. 24130. En BancPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

-The owners of certain tracts of land lying within the irrigation district of the appellant allowed water assessments thereon to become delinquent. The lands were put up for sale by the county treasurer, under the procedure outlined in Rem. Rev. Stat., § 7444. There being no bidders therefor, the property was “struck off to the irrigation district as the purchaser,” as provided in Rem. Rev. Stat., § 7445. The latter section contains a provision to the effect that the irrigation district, as purchaser, shall have the same rights as a private person, and may assign or transfer the certificate,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gasaway v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. De Voe v. RundleWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Snow's Mobile Homes, Inc. v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Seattle-King County Council of Camp Fire v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Heisey v. Port of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Kennewick Irrigation District v. Benton CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Gengler v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API