Legal Opinion

Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Ivarson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1943No. 29166PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

This action was brought by Libby, McNeill & Libby against the treasurer of Whatcom county to restrain him from selling a quantity of canned salmon dis-trained by him for an alleged nonpayment of taxes assessed against it. A trial before the court resulted in a decree enjoining the sale, and the county treasurer appeals.

Between September 18 and October 8, 1942, the re spondent shipped from Alaska to Bellingham 67,284 cases of canned salmon, and stored them at the municipal dock. On January 9, 1943, the assessor of Whatcom county listed and assessed the salmon as of January 1, 1943. On March…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilberg v. Yakima CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. ParishWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Kennewick Irrigation District v. Benton CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Mogan v. LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Richland Irrigation District v. De BowWashington Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. CLEAN v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Convention Center Coalition v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Pacific Northwest Annual Conference of United Methodist Church v. Walla Walla CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. Cowlitz CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API