Legal Opinion

Gasaway v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1909No. 7663PublishedCited by 55 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered April 25, 1908, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to recover real property and to quiet title.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover from defendant, the city of Seattle, certain lands held by it under condemnation proceedings. The land sought to be recovered consists of three tracts, and together they comprise a part of the right of way and water-shed acquired by the city in connection with its Cedar river water system. One of these tracts was acquired by condemnation proceedings in July, 1896; the others by like proceedings in 1901. In each case the value of the property as assessed by a jury was paid into the office of the clerk of the superior court. The assignee of the owner…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. DunningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Watson v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Samish River Boom Co. v. Union Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Seattle & Montana Railway Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. City of Tacoma v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Childress County v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Snow's Mobile Homes, Inc. v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Tomasek v. Oregon State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Great Northern Railway Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1918

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API