Legal Opinion

Manufactured Housing Institute v. Pettersen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 1984No. C7-83-124PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

Appellants contend that a Minnesota Health Department rule setting a maximum indoor air level of formaldehyde in newly constructed housing units is invalid. They claim that the Commissioner of Health exceeded his authority in promulgating the rule, and that the rule is unconstitutional. They further claim the district court erred in restricting its review solely to the record in the administrative rulemak-ing proceeding. We hold that judicial re view is on the record, but we also find that the maximum ambient level set by the rule is an arbitrary and capricious…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Mammenga v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Marriage of Clay v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Jacka v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. In Re the Welfare of K.S.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API