Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
In 1837, the United States entered into a Treaty with several Bands of Chippewa Indians. Under the terms of this Treaty, the Indians ceded land in present-day Wisconsin and Minnesota to the United States, and the United States guar*176anteed to the Indians certain hunting, fishing, and gathering rights on the ceded land. We must decide whether the Chippewa Indians retain these usufructuary rights today. The State of Minnesota argues that the Indians lost these rights through an Executive Order in 1850, an 1855 Treaty, and the admission of Minnesota into the Union in 1858. After an examination of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Regan v. Time, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by236 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New Eng.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. Freddie J. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Michael Wang v. Robert Masaitis, U.S. MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Randall v. SorrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
231 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.