White Bear Lake Restoration Ass'n ex rel. State v. Minn. Dep't of Natural Res.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ISSUES
I. Did the district court err by determining that Minn. Stat. § 116B.03, subd. 1, applies to claims relating to DNR-issued groundwater-appropriation permits?
II. Did the district court err by concluding that the common-law public-trust doctrine applies to groundwater in Minnesota?
ANALYSIS
Together, appellants make nine arguments. They argue that the district court erred by (1) allowing the action to proceed under Minn. Stat. § 116B.03 instead of Minn. Stat. § 116B.10, (2) misapplying the public-trust doctrine, (3) denying summary judgment on the ground that respondents failed to exhaust…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Oregon Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.