Legal Opinion

Valley Mortuary v. Fairbanks

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1950No. 7350PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Chief Justice.

Action by the respondent, plaintiff below, to enjoin the appellant, defendant below, from operating a funeral business in a specified area in alleged violation of an agreement between the parties, and to recover damages for alleged past infractions of the agreement. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.

The defendant, doing business as the Lionel Fairbanks Mortuary, entered into a written agreement with the plaintiff corporation in August of 1945 wherein the defendant sold and the plaintiff purchased for $5,500' the defendant’s…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Angus v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Farrell v. City of OntarioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Connell v. BowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Thomson v. ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Peterson v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dugan v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Allen v. Rose Park PharmacyUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Richards v. BaumUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Electrical Distributors, Inc. v. SFR, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. International Harvester Credit Corp. v. Pioneer Tractor & Implement, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API